Alex Jones trial verdict replace: Infowars host says Sandy Hook capturing was 100% actual

Alex Jones’ lawyers accidentally sent his text messages to the prosecution

InfoWars founder and conspiracy theorist Alex Jones has testified in the defamation trial against him over his claim that the 2012 Sandy Hook school shooting, in which 20 children and six adults were killed, was a hoax.

Giving evidence before the jury, Jones said: “Especially since I met the parents. It’s 100% true.” It was brought to court in Austin, Texas by Neil Heslin and Scarlett Lewis, the parents of Jesse Lewis, who was six years old when he was killed in the tragedy in Newtown, Connecticut.

Both gave impassioned testimonies in the witness box.

Jones faces potential damages of up to $150m. The radio host underwent an uncomfortable cross-examination on Wednesday morning when the plaintiff’s attorney denied much of what he testified and was asked if he knew what perjury was.

It also emerged that his own lawyer mistakenly shared the full contents of Jones’ phone with the opposition’s legal team – this is now being sought by the House select committee looking into the events surrounding the 6 January 2021 in Washington, DC, when Jones was there. in the city.


Report: January 6 probe to surrender Alex Jones texts and emails found in the Sandy Hook trial

The January 6 committee is preparing to recommend a subpoena Alex Jones‘ texts and emails accidentally sent to an attorney for Sandy’s kidney victims, according to a report.

Attorney Mark Bankston indicated that it was by mistake he obtained the number of thousands of private communications of Jones during the Infowars founder’s defamation trial on Wednesday.

Within minutes of the stunning revelation, the House committee investigating the attack on the US Capitol began preparing to cover up the messages, a source said. Rolling Stone.


Jones’ attorney mistakenly sent two years of his text messages to another lawyer

Alex Jonesattorney he sent two years of his text messages to the lawyer representing the parents of a child killed in the Sandy’s kidney school shooting, a court has been told.

Mark Bankston, who represents Neil Heslin and Scarlett Lewis in their ongoing defamation trial against Jones, made the stunning claim during cross-examination of the Infowars founder on Wednesday.


Watch: Sandy Hook victim’s mother confronts Alex Jones in court

Sandy Hook victim’s mother faces Alex Jones in court


Jones shakes his head as the Sandy Hook shooting is read out in court

Right wing predator Alex Jones He shook his head repeatedly as his lies about the Sandy’s kidney school shooting massacre was read out to a Texas jury on the first day of his libel trial.


ICYMI: Jones calls reporter ‘rogue’ outside Sandy Hook trial

Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones slammed a reporter outside his defamation trial for spreading false claims that the 2012 Sandy Hook school shooting took place.

“You think you’re a journalist, and you want to look up to people like me so you can say you’re a good person,” the Infowars host said Huffington Post journalist Sebastian Murdock.


Watch: Father of Sandy Hook victim testifies at Alex Jones trial

Father of Sandy Hook victim testifies at Alex Jones trial


Judge Gamble tells the opposing teams that she wants one attorney from each side in the building at all times while the jury is deliberating.

The parties do not need to be present.


The jury begins deliberations

The jury has been excused to begin their deliberations and may continue until 5pm CT (6pm ET).

They will then break for the night until 9am CT tomorrow.


Plaintiffs’ attorney Kyle Farrar is giving a final closing rebuttal.

“We’re still living the world of the Alex Jones conspiracy,” he says, where the plaintiffs are armed, the jury is hand-picked, and the judge is part of the Deep State.

“That’s the twist Jones is trying to put on this verdict.”

“They called them [the plaintiffs] liars for 10 years to make money, and they are calling them liars here to save money,” says Mr. Farrar on Jones’ defense argument to avoid a large financial compensation bill.

Mr Farrar says Jones’ apology is not worth it because his lawyer said his client had done nothing wrong.


Understandably, Martin Niemöller generated a lot of use of that poem online.

At first they came for the socialists, and I didn’t speak out—because I’m not a socialist.

Then they came for the unions, and I didn’t speak out—because I’m not a unionist.

Then they came to the Jews, and I did not speak out – because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me – and there was no one left to speak for me.

Leave a Comment